Governance evidence
Use for control statements that cite ISO/IEC 42001 clause 6.3 change management, EU AI Act Articles 62–75, and SOC 2 trust service criteria.
Working code isn’t enough. Good code is readable, maintainable, and testable. These practices separate professionals from beginners.
Controls stack visual kit
Reusable icons and a telemetry-to-audit diagram aligned to our fundamentals and operational guides.
Use for control statements that cite ISO/IEC 42001 clause 6.3 change management, EU AI Act Articles 62–75, and SOC 2 trust service criteria.
Pair with SBOM, provenance, and intake guidance that references SPDX or CycloneDX formats, SLSA Level 3 attestations, and NIST SSDF tasks PS.3/PO.4.
Highlight logging of prompts, responses, refusal rates, and safety filters alongside adversarial evaluation suites from NIST AI RMF playbooks or UK AISI guidance.
Use for incident response and assurance artefacts that must meet OMB M-24-10 24-hour notifications, CIRCIA’s 72-hour clocks, and serious-incident duties under the EU AI Act.
Code review isn’t criticism—it’s collaboration. As a reviewer: be kind, be specific, explain why. As an author: assume good intent, don’t take it personally, learn from feedback.
The best code is code that doesn’t need to exist. Before writing, ask: Is there a library for this? Can the design be simpler? Does this feature actually matter? The code you delete is the code you don’t have to maintain.