Policy Briefing — January 27, 2021

Executive briefing: President Joseph Biden signed Executive Order 14017, America's Supply Chains, on February 24, 2021, launching systematic reviews of critical product supply chains to identify vulnerabilities, dependencies on adversarial nations, and opportunities for domestic capacity expansion. The order directs cabinet secretaries to assess semiconductor manufacturing, high-capacity batteries, critical minerals and materials, and pharmaceuticals within 100 days, followed by comprehensive sectoral reviews over one year covering defense, public health, information technology, energy, transportation, and agricultural supply chains. This policy framework established foundation for subsequent legislative initiatives including CHIPS and Science Act, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and Inflation Reduction Act that authorized hundreds of billions in domestic manufacturing investments. Technology companies, manufacturers, and infrastructure providers should monitor sectoral review findings, engage in public comment processes, and position for procurement preferences and subsidy programs favoring domestic production and trusted suppliers.

Semiconductor supply chain assessment

The semiconductor review led by Commerce Department identified acute vulnerabilities in advanced logic chip production concentrated in Taiwan and South Korea, legacy chip manufacturing dependencies in China and Southeast Asia, and specialized equipment supply chains dominated by Netherlands, Japan, and United States. The analysis documented how pandemic demand surges, automotive industry recovery, and cryptocurrency mining created shortages affecting consumer electronics, industrial equipment, medical devices, and defense systems. Key findings emphasized risks from geopolitical tensions around Taiwan, single points of failure in advanced packaging facilities, and insufficient domestic capacity for mature node semiconductors used in automotive and industrial applications. Recommendations emphasized need for manufacturing incentives, research and development investments, workforce development programs, and secure supply chain partnerships with allied nations. These findings directly informed CHIPS and Science Act provisions allocating 52 billion dollars for semiconductor manufacturing incentives, research investments, and workforce development. Organizations depending on semiconductor supply chains should track CHIPS Act implementation including fab location decisions, capacity expansion timelines, and supplier qualification processes that will reshape global chip sourcing over next decade.

Battery supply chain vulnerabilities

The Department of Energy battery assessment revealed that United States domestic production covers only seven percent of global lithium-ion battery capacity despite massive projected demand growth from electric vehicles and grid storage. Critical mineral dependencies include lithium, cobalt, nickel, and graphite sourced predominantly from China, Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia, and Australia. Midstream processing including mineral refining, cathode production, and cell manufacturing concentrates in China controlling 70-80 percent of key supply chain stages. The review identified national security implications from battery dependencies affecting military equipment, emergency response vehicles, and critical infrastructure backup power systems. Recommended strategies included domestic mining expansion for lithium and rare earth elements, processing facility construction, battery manufacturing incentives, and recycling infrastructure development. These recommendations materialized in Inflation Reduction Act electric vehicle tax credits requiring North American battery assembly and increasing domestic content requirements, Infrastructure Act funding for charging networks and manufacturing facilities, and Defense Production Act authorizations for critical mineral processing. Organizations in electric vehicle, renewable energy, and consumer electronics sectors should assess how domestic content requirements, reshoring initiatives, and processing capacity expansion affect procurement strategies and total cost of ownership calculations.

Critical minerals and rare earth elements

The Department of Interior assessment catalogued dependencies on foreign sources for 31 of 35 minerals designated critical for economic security and national defense. China dominates rare earth element production with 70 percent of mining and 90 percent of processing capacity, creating chokepoint risks for defense electronics, renewable energy equipment, and advanced manufacturing. The review documented how environmental regulations, permitting timelines, and capital intensity created barriers to domestic mining expansion despite adequate geological reserves. Recommended mitigation strategies included streamlined permitting for strategic projects, research funding for processing technologies reducing environmental impact, partnerships with allied nations for supply diversification, and stockpile policies for most critical materials. Subsequent policy actions included Defense Production Act Title III investments in rare earth processing, Commerce Department export controls on critical mineral processing technologies, and State Department minerals security partnerships with Australia, Canada, and Japan. Organizations using rare earth elements in products including motors, batteries, catalysts, and electronic components should evaluate supply chain risks, qualify alternative suppliers in allied nations, and monitor technology development for substitution opportunities reducing dependency on scarce materials.

Pharmaceutical manufacturing resilience

The Health and Human Services pharmaceutical review identified that United States relies on foreign suppliers for 80 percent of active pharmaceutical ingredients, with China and India dominating generic drug production. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities when export restrictions, production disruptions, and demand surges created shortages of essential medicines including antibiotics, pain medications, and anesthetics. The assessment documented consolidation in pharmaceutical manufacturing creating single points of failure, limited visibility into complex supplier networks, and inadequate surge capacity for public health emergencies. Recommendations emphasized need for domestic manufacturing incentives, strategic stockpile expansion, supply chain transparency requirements, and quality oversight improvements for foreign facilities. Policy responses included Defense Production Act invocations for COVID therapeutics and vaccines, FDA initiatives for supply chain mapping, and legislative proposals for essential medicine manufacturing tax credits. Healthcare organizations, pharmaceutical distributors, and medical device manufacturers should enhance supply chain monitoring, diversify sourcing across multiple regions, maintain strategic inventory buffers for critical products, and participate in industry consortia developing supply chain resilience standards.

Defense industrial base implications

The Department of Defense sectoral review examined defense supply chains spanning raw materials through finished weapon systems, identifying concerning dependencies on foreign suppliers for key inputs. Analysis revealed that while final assembly occurs domestically for major systems, thousands of components source from China, Russia, or other nations of concern. Castings, forgings, printed circuit boards, displays, and specialized materials often lack domestic alternatives or qualify suppliers. Consolidation in defense contractor base reduced redundancy while increasing fragility when single suppliers experience disruptions. Workforce challenges including limited domestic talent pools for specialized manufacturing, declining vocational education, and competition from commercial sectors threaten sustainment of critical capabilities. Recommendations included expanding use of authorities under Defense Production Act, establishing public-private partnerships for dual-use technologies, investing in manufacturing technology research, and workforce development programs connecting military veterans to advanced manufacturing careers. Defense contractors and commercial suppliers to defense sector should review foreign content in supply chains, identify critical dependencies requiring mitigation, and evaluate opportunities to establish trusted supplier relationships qualifying for preferential procurement consideration.

Policy implementation and industry engagement

The supply chain reviews established policy frameworks operationalized through multiple legislative and administrative actions over subsequent years. Industry should monitor implementation across several tracks. CHIPS Act allocations through Commerce Department incentivize semiconductor fab construction, with application processes emphasizing workforce commitments, research partnerships, and economic security considerations. Infrastructure Act funding for battery manufacturing and charging networks flows through Energy Department programs prioritizing domestic content and supply chain resilience. Inflation Reduction Act tax credits for clean energy equipment include expanding domestic content requirements phasing in over 2024-2026. Defense Production Act Title III investments target specific capability gaps identified in sectoral reviews. Export controls and foreign investment reviews (CFIUS) increasingly scrutinize transactions involving critical supply chain technologies. Organizations should establish government affairs functions tracking program announcements, participating in solicitation processes, and coordinating with trade associations on implementation feedback. Supply chain mapping exercises identifying foreign dependencies enable proactive mitigation before mandates take effect. Early engagement with subsidy programs positions organizations for initial funding rounds often oversubscribed relative to available appropriations.

Action plan

Conduct supply chain mapping exercise identifying dependencies on foreign sources for components, materials, and services within sectors addressed by Executive Order reviews. Prioritize assessment of semiconductor, battery, rare earth, and pharmaceutical inputs based on product portfolios and operational requirements. Evaluate exposure to geopolitical disruption scenarios including Taiwan conflict, China export restrictions, or allied nations export controls. Develop mitigation strategies including supplier diversification, inventory buffering, domestic sourcing where economically feasible, and design changes reducing dependency on constrained materials. Monitor federal program announcements from Commerce Department, Energy Department, and Defense Department implementing supply chain resilience investments. Assess qualification for subsidy programs, tax credits, or procurement preferences based on domestic content, ally sourcing, or strategic capability development. Participate in industry association policy engagement efforts shaping program implementation rules, domestic content definitions, and transition timelines. Update procurement policies incorporating supply chain security criteria alongside traditional cost, quality, and delivery considerations. Establish executive governance for supply chain resilience initiatives ensuring cross-functional coordination and adequate resourcing.

Zeph Tech analysis

Executive Order 14017 represents fundamental shift in United States economic policy from decades of comparative advantage and globalization toward strategic competition and supply chain security. The reviews provided intellectual foundation and political momentum for industrial policy initiatives totaling over 500 billion dollars in manufacturing incentives, research investments, and infrastructure spending. This policy environment creates opportunities and obligations for organizations across technology, manufacturing, and infrastructure sectors. Organizations positioning early for domestic content requirements, subsidy programs, and preferential procurement gain competitive advantages while those maintaining offshore-centric supply chains face increasing regulatory friction and reputational risks. However, policy implementation remains uneven with funding announced but capacity construction requiring years to materialize. Semiconductor fabs break ground in 2023-2024 but reach full production in 2025-2027. Battery plants announced through 2022-2023 commence operations 2024-2026. Organizations cannot immediately substitute domestic suppliers that do not yet exist and must manage transition periods carefully. Policy continuity across administrations appears likely given bipartisan support for supply chain security, though specific program implementations and enforcement priorities may shift. China policy remains area of strong consensus driving continued investment in domestic alternatives. Organizations should avoid treating supply chain executive orders as temporary political gestures and instead prepare for sustained decoupling pressures across critical sectors. The reshoring imperative creates workforce development challenges as United States lacks sufficient workers with manufacturing skills for planned capacity expansions. Organizations should invest in training partnerships, automation technologies, and talent pipelines now rather than competing for scarce resources when facilities commence operations.

Related briefings

Curated signals from the same pillar or overlapping topics.

Policy · Credibility 91/100 · December 15, 2021

Policy Briefing — December 15, 2021

European Commission announces European Chips Act proposing 45 billion euros investment to strengthen semiconductor ecosystem and reduce strategic dependencies.

Policy · Credibility 89/100 · January 18, 2021

Policy Briefing — MAS Technology Risk Management Update

MAS’s 2021 Technology Risk Management update compels Singapore financial institutions to elevate board oversight, cybersecurity, third-party governance, and resilience programmes across their technology estates.

Policy · Credibility 90/100 · January 1, 2021

Policy Briefing — U.S. Corporate Transparency Act Enacted

Congressional enactment of the Corporate Transparency Act compels organisations to institutionalise beneficial ownership governance, technology controls, and multi-agency monitoring as FinCEN operationalises the federal…

Policy · Credibility 92/100 · March 4, 2021

Policy Briefing — SEC Climate and ESG Task Force Launch

The SEC’s Enforcement Division formed a Climate and ESG Task Force to mine disclosures for greenwashing, coordinate exams, and push issuers, advisors, and funds toward defensible governance, data, and controls for…

Policy · Credibility 92/100 · December 21, 2020

Policy Briefing — UK FCA TCFD Rule for Premium Listed Issuers

UK FCA Policy Statement PS20/17 introduced Listing Rule 9.8.6R(8) requiring premium listed companies to deliver TCFD-aligned annual report disclosures from 2021, with comply-or-explain expectations, governance…