Governance — SASAC compliance

On 6 September 2021 SASAC released the Measures for the Compliance Management of Central Enterprises (Trial), requiring centrally administered state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to build full compliance programs anchored in board oversight, chief compliance officers, and enterprise-wide risk controls. The measures respond to anti-corruption priorities and globalisation risks facing Chinese SOEs.

Key requirements

• Board responsibility. Boards of directors must establish compliance management committees, set annual priorities, and evaluate management performance against compliance objectives.
• Chief compliance officer. Enterprises must appoint chief compliance officers with independent authority, supported by dedicated departments that coordinate legal, audit, and internal control functions.
• Risk-based controls. SOEs must conduct compliance risk assessments covering domestic and overseas operations, third parties, finance, competition, data, and export controls, integrating findings into decision making.

Implications for boards

• Central SOEs. Boards should embed compliance objectives into annual business plans, link executive evaluations to compliance performance, and document escalation paths to SASAC.
• Global joint ventures. Partners of Chinese SOEs need to align joint venture governance charters with the Measures, clarifying compliance officer reporting lines and information-sharing duties.
• Public benefit enterprises. SOEs operating hospitals, universities, and infrastructure must extend compliance risk assessments to regulated sectors, including data localization and public procurement.

Action items

• Establish or refresh board-level compliance committees with charters aligned to SASAC expectations.
• Appoint chief compliance officers and develop independence safeguards, including direct access to the board and audit committee.
• Run full risk assessments across domestic and overseas operations, documenting mitigation plans and SASAC reporting templates.

Source material

• Measures for the Compliance Management of Central Enterprises (Trial)
• China issues measures to tighten compliance management in central SOEs

This brief helps central SOEs and joint ventures operationalize SASAC’s compliance measures through governance charters, risk assessments, and cross-border control testing.

Policy background

This development represents a significant milestone in the broader regulatory environment affecting governance initiatives globally. Organizations must understand not only the immediate requirements but also the interconnected policy frameworks that influence implementation strategies and compliance obligations.

The regulatory environment continues to evolve as policymakers balance innovation enablement with risk mitigation and stakeholder protection. This particular development reflects ongoing efforts to establish clear governance frameworks that support responsible adoption while maintaining appropriate safeguards against potential misuse or unintended consequences.

Stakeholders across multiple sectors should consider how this development intersects with existing compliance obligations under frameworks such as GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and industry-specific regulations. The interconnected nature of modern regulatory requirements means that addressing one area often has implications for related compliance domains.

Key considerations

Organizations seeking to align with these requirements should begin with a thorough gap analysis comparing current capabilities against the specified standards. This assessment should encompass technical infrastructure, organizational processes, personnel competencies, and governance mechanisms.

A phased implementation approach typically proves most effective, beginning with foundational elements before progressing to more advanced capabilities. Priority should be given to areas presenting the greatest risk exposure or compliance urgency, while building sustainable practices that can adapt to evolving requirements.

Key implementation factors include resource allocation, timeline management, stakeholder coordination, and change management. Organizations should establish clear governance structures to oversee implementation progress and ensure accountability across relevant business units and functional areas.

Technical implementation should follow security-by-design principles, incorporating appropriate controls from the outset rather than attempting to retrofit security measures after deployment. This approach typically reduces overall implementation costs while improving security posture and compliance outcomes.

Risk considerations

Effective risk management requires systematic identification, assessment, and treatment of risks associated with this development. Organizations should use established frameworks such as NIST RMF, ISO 31000, or COBIT to structure their risk management approach.

Risk identification should consider technical vulnerabilities, operational disruptions, regulatory penalties, reputational impacts, and strategic implications. Each identified risk should be assessed for likelihood and potential impact, with appropriate risk treatment strategies developed for high-priority items.

Continuous monitoring capabilities are essential for detecting emerging risks and evaluating the effectiveness of implemented controls. Organizations should establish key risk indicators and reporting mechanisms that provide timely visibility into risk exposure across relevant domains.

Risk tolerance thresholds should be established at the organizational level, with clear escalation procedures for risks that exceed acceptable levels. This governance framework ensures appropriate oversight while enabling agile responses to changing risk conditions.

Compliance plan

Developing a structured compliance roadmap helps organizations systematically address requirements while managing resource constraints and competing priorities. The roadmap should establish clear milestones, responsible parties, and success criteria for each compliance objective.

Near-term priorities typically focus on addressing imminent compliance deadlines and high-risk gaps. Medium-term initiatives build sustainable compliance capabilities through process improvements, technology investments, and workforce development. Long-term strategic planning ensures continued alignment as requirements evolve.

Documentation requirements should be addressed throughout the compliance journey, establishing evidence trails that demonstrate due diligence and support audit activities. Organizations should implement document management practices that ensure accessibility, version control, and appropriate retention.

Regular compliance assessments help organizations verify progress against roadmap objectives and identify areas requiring additional attention. These assessments should incorporate both internal reviews and independent third-party evaluations where appropriate.

Stakeholder considerations

This development affects multiple stakeholder groups, each with distinct interests, concerns, and information needs. Effective stakeholder management requires understanding these perspectives and developing appropriate engagement strategies.

Internal stakeholders including executive leadership, board members, operational teams, and employee populations require tailored communications that address their specific concerns and responsibilities. Clear role definitions and accountability structures support effective internal coordination.

External stakeholders such as customers, partners, regulators, and industry peers also have legitimate interests in organizational responses to this development. Transparent communication and demonstrated commitment to compliance build trust and support collaborative relationships.

Investor and analyst communities focus on governance, risk management, and compliance capabilities as indicators of organizational resilience and long-term value creation. Organizations should consider how their response to this development affects external perceptions and stakeholder confidence.

System requirements

Technology plays a critical enabling role in addressing the requirements associated with this development. Organizations should evaluate current technology capabilities against anticipated needs and develop enhancement plans where gaps exist.

Core technology considerations typically include data management systems, security infrastructure, monitoring and analytics platforms, and integration capabilities. Organizations should assess whether existing technology investments can be used or whether new capabilities are required.

Automation opportunities should be identified and prioritized based on efficiency gains, error reduction, and scalability benefits. Robotic process automation, artificial intelligence, and machine learning technologies may offer valuable capabilities for specific use cases.

Technology vendor relationships should be evaluated to ensure appropriate support for compliance requirements. Contractual provisions, service level agreements, and vendor security practices all merit attention as part of technology governance.

Coming developments

The regulatory and policy environment continues to evolve rapidly, with several emerging trends likely to influence future developments in this area. Organizations should maintain awareness of these trends and build adaptive capabilities that support ongoing compliance.

Regulatory convergence across jurisdictions creates both challenges and opportunities for multinational organizations. While harmonization efforts reduce compliance complexity in some areas, divergent national approaches require careful planning in others.

Technology evolution continues to create new capabilities and new risks requiring regulatory attention. Organizations should anticipate that current requirements will be supplemented or modified as policymakers respond to technological changes and emerging best practices.

Industry collaboration through standards bodies, professional associations, and informal networks provides valuable opportunities for sharing implementation experiences and influencing policy development. Active engagement in these forums supports more effective compliance outcomes.

More on this topic

Further reading from our research library.

Governance · Credibility 93/100 · February 11, 2021

Governance — Board oversight

The SEC put boards on notice in February 2021: cybersecurity oversight is a board responsibility. Expect to disclose your governance structure, whether you have cyber expertise on the board, and how you manage risk.

Governance · Credibility 91/100 · September 10, 2020

MAS Individual Accountability Guidelines harden senior manager oversight

Singapore’s Monetary Authority issued final Guidelines on Individual Accountability and Conduct effective 10 September 2020, requiring financial institutions to define senior manager responsibilities, strengthen conduct…

Governance · Credibility 73/100 · August 14, 2020

Taiwan and Corporate governance

Updated roadmap explainer detailing FSC Corporate Governance 3.0 priorities for board accountability, ESG metrics, assurance, and phased milestones through 2023.

Governance · Credibility 73/100 · June 30, 2020

Governance — Philippines

Full overview of the Philippine SEC’s 2020 Revised Code of Corporate Governance for public companies and registered issuers, highlighting board reforms, compliance expectations, and setup timelines.

Governance · Credibility 93/100 · December 16, 2022

CSRD and Sustainability reporting

The EU's new Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive is massive. Nearly 50,000 companies will need to report on everything from climate risk to human rights in their supply chains—with mandatory third-party…

Continue in the Governance pillar

Return to the hub for curated research and deep-dive guides.

Visit pillar hub

Latest guides

• Board Oversight Governance Blueprint

  Unify Basel Committee, PRA, SEC, and ISSB oversight mandates into an auditable board governance operating model with data lineage, assurance cadences, and regulatory source packs.

• Governance, Risk, and Oversight Playbook

  Operationalise board-level governance, risk oversight, and resilience reporting aligned with Basel Committee principles, ECB supervisory expectations, U.S. SR 21-3, and OCC…

• Third-Party Governance Control Blueprint

  Deliver OCC, Federal Reserve, PRA, EBA, DORA, MAS, and OSFI third-party governance requirements through board reporting, lifecycle controls, and resilience evidence.

Source material

1. Measures for the Compliance Management of Central Enterprises (Trial) — State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council
2. China issues measures to tighten compliance management in central SOEs — State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council
3. ISO 37000:2021 — Governance of Organizations — International Organization for Standardization