← Back to all briefings
Governance 6 min read Published Updated Credibility 91/100

OMB issues Federal Zero Trust Strategy (M-22-09)

Zero trust is not just a buzzword anymore—it is federal policy. OMB's M-22-09 gives agencies concrete deadlines to adopt zero trust architecture: identity-centric access, encrypted traffic everywhere, continuous validation. If you are selling to the government or working with federal data, this is the security model you need to support.

Kodi C.

Editor & Research Lead

Verified for technical accuracy — Kodi C.

Governance pillar illustration for Zeph Tech briefings
Governance, ESG, and board reporting briefings

The Office of Management and Budget published Memorandum M-22-09 on , setting a government-wide Zero Trust Strategy for U.S. federal civilian agencies. The policy requires agencies to meet specific targets by the end of FY2024 across identity, devices, networks, applications, and data.

Five pillar requirements

  • Identity: Deploy enterprise-wide phishing-resistant MFA (FIDO2/WebAuthn) for staff accessing government systems. Establish centralized identity providers with continuous validation.
  • Devices: Maintain full device inventories with real-time compliance monitoring. Implement endpoint detection and response across all government endpoints.
  • Networks: Segment networks based on application requirements. Encrypt all DNS and HTTP traffic. Implement TIC 3.0 cloud-appropriate architectures.
  • Applications and Workloads: Treat all applications as internet-connected. Implement rigorous testing and vulnerability management. Migrate to cloud services with appropriate FedRAMP authorization.
  • Data: Develop automated data categorization and tagging. Implement encryption for data at rest and in transit. Deploy data loss prevention controls.

Implementation milestones

Agencies must achieve specific outcomes by end of FY2024, including universal phishing-resistant MFA, complete device inventory, encrypted traffic, application security testing, and data categorization. Quarterly progress reporting to OMB tracks setup status.

Vendor implications

Program leaders should map existing modernization and TIC 3.0 efforts to the memorandum's pillars, focus on phishing-resistant authentication rollout, and align application and data security plans with the required milestones to secure budget and oversight approval. Federal contractors must align products with zero trust requirements.

Cited sources

Strategy Overview

OMB Memorandum M-22-09, Moving the U.S. Government Toward Zero Trust Cybersecurity Principles, establishes the federal government's strategy for zero trust architecture adoption. Released on January 26, 2022, the memorandum requires federal agencies to achieve specific zero trust security goals by the end of fiscal year 2024, representing the most full federal cybersecurity mandate since the 2015 Cybersecurity Strategy.

The strategy responds to evolving cyber threats and the reality that traditional perimeter-based security cannot protect modern distributed workforces and cloud-based infrastructure. By eliminating implicit trust and requiring continuous verification, zero trust architecture reduces the attack surface available to adversaries and limits the impact of successful compromises.

Identity-Centric Security Requirements

Identity serves as the foundation of the federal zero trust strategy. Agencies must implement enterprise-wide identity management, consolidating disparate identity stores and establishing authoritative identity sources. Phishing-resistant multi-factor authentication is required for all agency staff accessing federal systems, with explicit prohibition of SMS and voice-based authentication methods for privileged accounts.

Single sign-on capabilities must integrate with agency applications, reducing password sprawl and enabling centralized access management. Identity governance programs must maintain accurate user provisioning and deprovisioning, with automated workflows for personnel changes and regular access certifications ensuring principle of least privilege enforcement.

Device Security and Network Controls

Full asset inventory requirements mandate agencies maintain complete visibility into devices accessing federal networks. Endpoint detection and response capabilities must be deployed agency-wide, with automated threat detection and response procedures. Device compliance verification must inform access decisions, with non-compliant devices subject to restricted access or remediation requirements.

Network architecture must evolve toward micro-segmentation, reducing blast radius from compromised systems. DNS queries must use encrypted protocols, and agencies must implement network monitoring capabilities enabling detection of lateral movement and anomalous traffic patterns. Legacy network architectures require modernization plans with clear migration timelines.

Application and Data Security

Application security requirements mandate secure development practices, continuous security testing, and runtime protection. Applications must authenticate all requests and implement fine-grained authorization based on user identity, device posture, and contextual factors. API security controls protect inter-application communications and prevent unauthorized data access.

Data protection includes classification, encryption, and access logging requirements. Agencies must implement data loss prevention capabilities and maintain audit trails supporting forensic investigation. Cloud-based data storage must employ encryption in transit and at rest, with key management practices aligned with federal standards.

Implementation Timeline and Accountability

The memorandum establishes specific deadlines for zero trust setup milestones. Agency Chief Information Officers bear responsibility for developing setup plans and reporting progress to OMB. Quarterly status reports enable tracking and identification of agencies requiring additional support or resources.

Budget submissions must align with zero trust requirements, with technology investments justified against the strategy's security goals. Procurement decisions should focus on solutions supporting zero trust principles, and agencies should use governmentwide contracts and shared services where available to accelerate setup.

Summary

OMB M-22-09 represents a transformational shift in federal cybersecurity, requiring full security architecture modernization across all civilian agencies. Successful setup demands sustained executive commitment, adequate resourcing, and cross-functional coordination between security, IT operations, and business teams. The strategy's principles extend beyond federal agencies, providing a model for private sector organizations seeking to modernize their security posture.

Agency Implementation Considerations

Federal agencies face varying levels of technical debt and legacy system complexity that affect zero trust setup timelines. Agencies should conduct thorough assessments of existing infrastructure, identifying systems requiring modernization and those capable of incremental improvement. Prioritization frameworks should consider both security risk and business criticality when sequencing setup activities.

Workforce development represents a critical success factor, as zero trust setup requires specialized skills in identity management, cloud security, and security automation. Agencies should invest in training programs and consider strategic hiring to build internal capabilities. Partnerships with industry vendors and system integrators can supplement internal expertise during transition periods.

Change management processes must address organizational culture shifts required for zero trust adoption. Stakeholder communication, user training, and iterative rollout approaches help manage resistance and ensure sustainable adoption. Regular assessment against CISA's Zero Trust Maturity Model provides benchmark metrics for tracking progress and identifying improvement opportunities.

Coordination with CISA and other federal partners provides technical assistance and shared solutions that can accelerate setup while ensuring consistency across agencies. Engagement with industry through public-private partnerships supports development of solutions meeting federal requirements while maintaining commercial viability for broader adoption.

Documentation of architectural decisions, setup progress, and lessons learned supports knowledge sharing and enables continuous improvement of zero trust practices across the federal enterprise. Successful transformation positions agencies for emerging challenges while establishing security foundations supporting digital modernization initiatives.

Ongoing investment in security automation and orchestration capabilities reduces operational burden while improving response times to security events.

Regular training reinforces security-aware culture.

Continuous monitoring verifies control effectiveness.

Strategic planning supports long-term success.

Federal Mandate Requirements

OMB M-22-09 establishes specific zero trust milestones for federal agencies including phishing-resistant MFA deployment, device compliance verification, and network segmentation. Agency CIOs bear accountability for implementation progress with quarterly reporting requirements.

Vendor Implications

Federal contractors must align offerings with zero trust requirements to support agency implementation. FedRAMP authorization now requires zero trust architecture alignment. Vendors should demonstrate how products support identity-centric security models.

Private Sector Adoption

Federal zero trust mandates establish de facto standards influencing commercial security practices. Organizations seeking federal contracts must demonstrate zero trust maturity. Best practices emerging from federal implementation inform broader industry adoption.

See also

Selected articles on related subjects.

Continue in the Governance pillar

Return to the hub for curated research and deep-dive guides.

Visit pillar hub

Latest guides

  • Board Oversight Governance Blueprint

    Unify Basel Committee, PRA, SEC, and ISSB oversight mandates into an auditable board governance operating model with data lineage, assurance cadences, and regulatory source packs.

  • Third-Party Governance Control Blueprint

    Deliver OCC, Federal Reserve, PRA, EBA, DORA, MAS, and OSFI third-party governance requirements through board reporting, lifecycle controls, and resilience evidence.

  • Public-Sector Governance Alignment Playbook

    Align OMB Circular A-123, GAO Green Book, OMB M-24-10 AI guidance, EU public sector directives, and UK Orange Book with digital accountability, risk management, and service…

Coverage intelligence

Published
Coverage pillar
Governance
Source credibility
91/100 — high confidence
Topics
Zero Trust · Identity and Access Management · Federal Compliance
Sources cited
3 sources (hitehouse.gov, csrc.nist.gov, cisa.gov)
Reading time
6 min

Cited sources

  1. OMB M-22-09 — whitehouse.gov
  2. NIST SP 800-207 — nist.gov
  3. CISA Zero Trust Model — cisa.gov
  • Zero Trust
  • Identity and Access Management
  • Federal Compliance
Back to curated briefings

Comments

Community

We publish only high-quality, respectful contributions. Every submission is reviewed for clarity, sourcing, and safety before it appears here.

    Share your perspective

    Submissions showing "Awaiting moderation" are in review. Spam, low-effort posts, or unverifiable claims will be rejected. We verify submissions with the email you provide, and we never publish or sell that address.

    Verification

    Complete the CAPTCHA to submit.