Governance — Climate disclosure

Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) opened consultation on improvements to its ESG disclosure framework that would mandate climate-related reporting aligned with the International Sustainability Standards Board’s IFRS S2 beginning with financial years starting on or after 1 January 2024. The proposal requires all issuers to provide governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics disclosures consistent with TCFD, including Scope 1, Scope 2, and eventually Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, climate resilience analysis, and financed emissions for financial institutions. Boards must treat the consultation as a near-term compliance blueprint, mobilising climate data infrastructure, scenario analysis, and assurance programs ahead of the expected rule adoption.

HKEX plans phased relief for certain data points—allowing a two-year grace period for Scope 3 emissions and financed emissions while still expecting issuers to describe methodologies and transition plans in the interim. The exchange also proposes industry-specific guidance, cross-referencing the Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s climate risk practices and the Insurance Authority’s supervisory expectations, signaling convergence across financial regulators. Issuers should early upgrade governance, controls, and technology to avoid scrambling once the consultation closes and final rules issue.

Capability and disclosure expansion

The consultation expands requirements across several capability areas:

• Governance transparency. Boards must describe oversight structures, climate competency, and integration with risk management processes. HKEX expects disclosure of board-level training, expertise, and how incentives align with climate objectives.
• Strategy and resilience. Issuers must present qualitative and quantitative scenario analysis covering multiple time horizons, material climate risks and opportunities, and transition plans with interim targets.
• Risk management integration. Companies must explain processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate risks, including how they interact with enterprise risk management frameworks and supply-chain due diligence.
• Metrics and targets. Required metrics include absolute emissions, emissions intensity, internal carbon pricing, use of renewable energy, and progress against science-based targets. Financial institutions must provide financed, helped, or insurance-associated emissions depending on business model.

HKEX aligns definitions with IFRS S2, providing international investors with comparable data and enabling issuers to use global reporting systems. However, the breadth of metrics and scenario expectations will stretch data architecture and modeling capabilities—particularly for mid-cap issuers lacking mature sustainability teams.

Path to implementation

Issuers should structure setup into pragmatic phases:

• Diagnostic and governance alignment. Conduct gap analysis comparing current ESG reporting to the proposed Appendix 27 requirements. Map board oversight committees, management responsibilities, and reporting lines; schedule board education on IFRS S2 concepts and sector risk pathways.
• Data and technology upgrades. Expand data capture for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions across subsidiaries, joint ventures, and leased assets. Implement supplier engagement programs, data sharing protocols, and digital platforms to quantify Scope 3 categories within the two-year transition window.
• Scenario analysis and target setting. Develop climate scenarios consistent with IPCC pathways (1.5°C and well-below 2°C) and local physical risk projections for Hong Kong and key operating geographies. Translate findings into capital allocation plans, resilience investments, and transition targets with interim checkpoints.
• Assurance and reporting controls. Establish internal controls over climate data, including segregation of duties, audit trails, and validation rules. Engage external assurance providers early to align methodologies with expected assurance mandates and investor expectations.

Given the short setup window, issuers should integrate climate reporting into annual report planning cycles and align with other jurisdictional requirements (such as EU CSRD or Mainland China guidance) to avoid duplicative processes.

Responsible governance and oversight

HKEX emphasizes board accountability and cross-functional governance:

• Board oversight. Boards should document climate governance charters, delegate responsibilities to sustainability committees, and define key risk indicators (KRIs) for transition and physical risk exposure.
• Management accountability. Assign C-suite sponsors—such as the CFO and CRO—to integrate climate metrics into financial planning, stress testing, and risk appetite statements. Link remuneration to delivery of climate targets.
• Policy integration. Align climate governance with existing HKMA supervisory policy manual modules, SFC Fund Manager Code of Conduct requirements, and Insurance Authority guidance to ensure consistent messaging to regulators and investors.
• Stakeholder engagement. Plan structured dialogs with investors, lenders, and civil society to validate scenario assumptions and disclose transition plans transparently.

These governance mechanisms should be codified in board minutes and sustainability policies so issuers can evidence oversight during HKEX reviews or investor engagements.

Sector-specific guidance

• Financial institutions. Banks and asset managers must develop methodologies for financed emissions (using PCAF standards), set portfolio decarbonisation targets, and integrate climate risk into credit approval and asset allocation. Scenario analysis should align with HKMA’s Climate Risk Management guidelines.
• Property and infrastructure. Quantify physical risk exposure (flooding, heat stress) for major assets, model capital expenditure for resilience upgrades, and disclose energy efficiency roadmaps aligned with Hong Kong’s Climate Action Plan 2050.
• Manufacturing and supply chain-intensive sectors. Map upstream suppliers, prioritize high-emission categories for data collection, and introduce supplier engagement programs to improve emission factor quality.
• Technology and services. Integrate climate scenario outputs into product innovation pipelines, explaining how services support client decarbonisation and referencing renewable energy procurement strategies.

Measurement and progress tracking

Issuers should design dashboards to monitor progress and evidence compliance:

• Emissions completeness. Track coverage of Scope 1 and Scope 2 data (percentage of sites metered, percentage of energy sources tracked) and maturity of Scope 3 category estimation. Document methodological changes and assurance status.
• Scenario readiness. Maintain scenario libraries with assumptions, model owners, and update frequency. Record how scenario insights influence capital allocation and risk appetite decisions.
• Target performance. Monitor interim emissions reduction milestones, renewable energy uptake, and investment in transition or adaptation projects.
• Governance evidence. Collect board meeting minutes, training completion records, and executive compensation linkage to show oversight.
• Assurance readiness. Track progress toward limited then reasonable assurance by documenting control testing, third-party assurance engagements, and remediation of audit findings across emission scopes and scenario models.
• Investor engagement. Track investor queries, responses, and feedback to refine disclosures and ensure alignment with global climate reporting expectations.

Integrating these metrics into enterprise performance management systems will simplify upcoming assurance and regulatory reviews, while reinforcing accountability for climate commitments.

This brief supports HKEX-listed companies with IFRS S2 readiness assessments, climate data architectures, and governance playbooks that convert disclosure obligations into actionable transition strategies.

Issuers should also watch for the ISSB’s IFRS S1 general sustainability disclosure requirements, which HKEX intends to consider in future phases; building modular reporting architectures now will ease multi-framework alignment.

See also

Selected articles on related subjects.

Governance · Credibility 90/100 · March 31, 2023

Tse Capital Efficiency Initiative

Tokyo Stock Exchange's capital efficiency initiative in 2023 pushed listed companies to improve price-to-book ratios. Japanese corporate governance reform accelerated with this initiative. Understanding TSE expectations…

Governance · Credibility 73/100 · September 13, 2023

OECD and Corporate governance

The G20 backed revised OECD corporate governance principles in September 2023. Boards now have clearer expectations around sustainability oversight, digital risk, and shareholder rights. Time to update your governance…

Governance · Credibility 73/100 · February 28, 2024

Governance — Singapore regulation

SGX RegCo’s February 2024 consultation would hardwire IFRS S1/S2 climate reporting, phased assurance, and board competency disclosures into listing rules from FY2025, demanding rapid upgrades to governance, data, and…

Governance · Credibility 73/100 · April 4, 2022

Japan and Corporate governance

The Tokyo Stock Exchange’s April 4, 2022 market restructuring into Prime, Standard, and Growth segments raises governance and disclosure expectations, requiring listed companies to strengthen investor relations, capital…

Governance · Credibility 91/100 · March 21, 2022

SEC Climate Disclosure Rules

SEC proposes climate disclosure rules requiring public companies to report greenhouse gas emissions, climate risks, and transition plans in registration statements.

Continue in the Governance pillar

Return to the hub for curated research and deep-dive guides.

Visit pillar hub

Latest guides

• Board Oversight Governance Blueprint

  Unify Basel Committee, PRA, SEC, and ISSB oversight mandates into an auditable board governance operating model with data lineage, assurance cadences, and regulatory source packs.

• Third-Party Governance Control Blueprint

  Deliver OCC, Federal Reserve, PRA, EBA, DORA, MAS, and OSFI third-party governance requirements through board reporting, lifecycle controls, and resilience evidence.

• Public-Sector Governance Alignment Playbook

  Align OMB Circular A-123, GAO Green Book, OMB M-24-10 AI guidance, EU public sector directives, and UK Orange Book with digital accountability, risk management, and service…

Coverage intelligence

Published

April 24, 2023

Coverage pillar

Governance

Source credibility

76/100 — medium confidence

Topics

Climate disclosure · Hong Kong regulation · Corporate governance

Sources cited

5 sources (hkex.com.hk, hkma.gov.hk, ifrs.org)

Reading time

5 min

Cited sources

1. HKEX consults on climate-related disclosures — Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited
2. Consultation Paper on Enhancement of Climate-Related Disclosures Under the ESG Framework — Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited
3. HKMA Supervisory Policy Manual GS-1 Climate Risk Management — Hong Kong Monetary Authority
4. Consultation Paper Summary: Enhancement of Climate-Related Disclosures — Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited
5. IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures — International Sustainability Standards Board