Governance Briefing — January 15, 2024
The Tokyo Stock Exchange’s January update shifts its capital efficiency campaign from disclosure to execution, pushing boards to deliver measurable plans, investor engagement, and sustainability-linked value creation.
On 15 January 2024, the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) intensified its campaign to push listed companies toward cost-of-capital-conscious management. It published updated disclosure statistics covering Prime and Standard Market issuers, highlighted case studies of boards that have articulated capital efficiency improvement plans, and announced a new expectation that companies will provide progress updates at least annually. The exchange made clear that the initiative—launched in March 2023 as “Action to Implement Management that is Conscious of Cost of Capital and Stock Price”—is shifting from awareness-raising to execution oversight. Boards, investor relations leaders, and sustainability officers must now convert investor communications into measurable governance, capital allocation, and operational reforms that can withstand scrutiny from domestic and global shareholders.
Reassessing governance structures and disclosure cadence
The TSE’s January update emphasised recurring disclosure. Prime Market companies are expected to publish analyses of their cost of capital and market valuation gaps, describe management strategies to close those gaps, and report progress on at least an annual basis—ideally coinciding with annual securities reports or integrated reports. Standard Market issuers are strongly encouraged to do the same. Corporate secretaries should coordinate board calendars to ensure that strategy sessions, capital policy reviews, and disclosure approvals align with these deadlines. Boards should document their deliberations on capital efficiency, capturing considerations such as portfolio rationalisation, dividend policy, share buybacks, and investments in growth businesses.
To demonstrate accountability, companies should update board skill matrices to reflect expertise in capital markets, corporate finance, and investor engagement. Nomination committees must assess whether independent directors possess the necessary competencies to challenge management on cost of capital assumptions and strategic investments. Remuneration committees should evaluate executive incentive structures, ensuring that total shareholder return, return on invested capital (ROIC), and other value creation metrics influence pay outcomes. Disclosure controls should extend to capital efficiency communications, with internal audit verifying the accuracy of metrics and narratives presented to investors.
Quantifying cost of capital and value creation plans
TSE expects issuers to calculate their weighted average cost of capital (WACC) using transparent assumptions for risk-free rates, equity risk premiums, beta coefficients, and cost of debt. Finance teams should document methodologies, data sources, and sensitivity analyses, making them available for investor review. Companies should benchmark their WACC and valuation multiples against domestic and international peers, identifying structural reasons for discounts. Value creation plans must explain how management will exceed the cost of capital, including through margin improvement, asset productivity, and disciplined capital allocation.
Operational excellence initiatives should be linked to financial targets. For example, manufacturers might detail plans to optimise factory utilisation, adopt digital twins, or renegotiate supplier contracts. Service companies could describe customer acquisition strategies, pricing reforms, or platform investments that drive recurring revenue. Each initiative should include milestones, key performance indicators, and responsible executives. Investors will expect clear articulation of how capital expenditure, R&D budgets, and M&A activities contribute to long-term value creation rather than diluting returns.
Embedding sustainability and human capital considerations
The exchange has signalled that sustainability factors are integral to cost-of-capital management, particularly as global asset owners integrate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks into pricing models. Companies should align their capital efficiency narratives with decarbonisation roadmaps, human capital strategies, and supply chain resilience programs. Sustainability teams must work with finance to quantify how emissions reduction investments, diversity initiatives, and supplier engagement improve risk-adjusted returns. Integrated reporting should connect sustainability metrics—such as Scope 1-3 emissions, talent retention, and product lifecycle impacts—to financial outcomes.
Investors are scrutinising how companies deploy capital to meet Japan’s 2050 carbon neutrality goals. Boards should oversee scenario analyses that evaluate the cost of delayed transition, potential carbon pricing impacts, and exposure to international border adjustment mechanisms. Disclosures should highlight governance frameworks overseeing climate risk, including board committees, executive steering groups, and internal carbon pricing mechanisms. Demonstrating credible transition plans can reduce risk premiums, improving valuation multiples and lowering financing costs.
Enhancing investor engagement and market communication
TSE’s update underscores the importance of proactive investor dialogue. Companies should develop investor engagement strategies that segment domestic and foreign shareholders, tailor messaging to their priorities, and capture feedback for board consideration. Investor relations teams must prepare detailed Q&A materials explaining valuation gaps, capital allocation decisions, and progress toward financial targets. Post-engagement reports should document issues raised, commitments made, and follow-up actions, feeding into board discussions and public disclosures.
Digital communication channels—such as websites, integrated report microsites, and ESG data portals—should host capital efficiency materials in both Japanese and English to reach global investors. Companies should ensure that presentation decks, regulatory filings, and sustainability reports use consistent metrics and narratives. Social media and webcast platforms can support broader dissemination, but content must undergo the same disclosure controls as statutory reports to prevent selective disclosure risks.
Operationalising monitoring and assurance
Management should design internal monitoring frameworks that track progress against cost-of-capital initiatives. Key metrics may include ROIC, economic value added (EVA), free cash flow conversion, asset turnover, and total shareholder return. Dashboards should provide monthly or quarterly visibility to executives and boards, highlighting variances and enabling timely corrective actions. Internal audit and finance control teams must validate data accuracy, testing reconciliations between management reporting and statutory accounts.
External assurance can enhance credibility. Companies may engage auditors or third-party reviewers to attest to WACC calculations, valuation methodology, or ESG-linked capital expenditure claims. Assurance scopes should be clearly defined, with reports summarised in investor communications. Compliance teams should document how assurance findings inform remediation plans, policy updates, or process improvements.
Coordinating with regulatory and stakeholder expectations
The TSE initiative intersects with other regulatory developments, including the Financial Services Agency’s (FSA) revisions to Japan’s Corporate Governance Code and Stewardship Code. Companies must ensure that board independence, cross-shareholding policies, and succession planning meet these codes while supporting capital efficiency goals. Additionally, companies with overseas listings or global investor bases should reconcile TSE disclosures with requirements in other jurisdictions, such as U.S. Form 20-F filings or EU sustainability reporting obligations.
Stakeholders beyond investors—employees, lenders, customers, and communities—will examine how capital efficiency strategies influence long-term resilience. Companies should integrate stakeholder feedback into capital allocation decisions, demonstrating that efficiency does not come at the expense of innovation, workforce development, or responsible business practices. Balanced messaging can mitigate reputational risk and support sustainable valuation improvements.
By institutionalising disciplined governance, transparent reporting, and stakeholder engagement, Japanese issuers can meet the TSE’s heightened expectations and unlock valuation uplifts. The January 2024 update is a clear signal that the exchange will monitor progress closely; companies that lag may face reputational pressure, investor activism, or increased regulatory scrutiny.
Continue in the Governance pillar
Return to the hub for curated research and deep-dive guides.
Latest guides
-
Public-Sector Governance Alignment Playbook — Zeph Tech
Align OMB Circular A-123, GAO Green Book, OMB M-24-10 AI guidance, EU public sector directives, and UK Orange Book with digital accountability, risk management, and service…
-
Third-Party Governance Control Blueprint — Zeph Tech
Deliver OCC, Federal Reserve, PRA, EBA, DORA, MAS, and OSFI third-party governance requirements through board reporting, lifecycle controls, and resilience evidence.
-
Governance, Risk, and Oversight Playbook — Zeph Tech
Operationalise board-level governance, risk oversight, and resilience reporting aligned with Basel Committee principles, ECB supervisory expectations, U.S. SR 21-3, and OCC…