← Back to all briefings
AI 5 min read Published Updated Credibility 92/100

NAIRR Task Force Issues Blueprint for Shared AI Infrastructure — January 24, 2023

The NAIRR Task Force’s January 2023 final report delivers a blueprint for a federated national AI research resource that pools compute, data, tools, and training under a responsible governance framework to democratise U.S. innovation.

Timeline plotting source publication cadence sized by credibility.
4 publication timestamps supporting this briefing. Source data (JSON)

Executive briefing: The National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource (NAIRR) Task Force published its final report on , proposing a $2.6 billion, six-year programme that federates U.S. public and private compute, data sets, software, and educational assets into a secure platform for researchers and students. The blueprint recommends phased pilots starting in fiscal year 2023, a governance model anchored by an interagency NAIRR steering committee, and comprehensive responsible AI safeguards spanning privacy, security, civil rights, and evaluation. Institutions pursuing federal AI research funding should align roadmaps, partnerships, and compliance controls to the task force recommendations to maximise eligibility for future NAIRR calls.

Architecture and phased implementation roadmap

The task force envisions NAIRR as a federated system with four integrated pillars: NAIRR Core (compute and cloud credits), NAIRR Datasets (curated, privacy-protected corpora), NAIRR Testbeds (domain-specific infrastructure such as robotics or wireless), and NAIRR Education (training materials and user support). Implementation spans four phases. Phase 1 (2023–2024) launches pilots leveraging existing NSF, DOE, and commercial cloud resources, while Phase 2 (2024–2025) expands to additional agencies and formalises user support services. Phase 3 (2025–2026) integrates advanced capabilities such as secure multiparty computation and cross-agency identity management. Phase 4 (2026–2028) scales nationwide participation with sustained funding and programmatic evaluation. The report emphasises interoperability via standard APIs, federated authentication, and policy alignment with the Federal Data Strategy.

Governance, funding, and responsible stewardship

The task force recommends establishing NAIRR governance through an interagency steering committee co-chaired by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, supported by an executive office and advisory council representing academia, industry, civil society, and state, local, Tribal, and territorial (SLTT) governments. The steering committee would oversee budget execution, partnership agreements, and compliance with statutes such as the Privacy Act, the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act, and Title VI civil rights protections. The report proposes a mix of congressional appropriations and partner contributions, with $2.6 billion in federal investment over six years and cost-sharing through cloud credits, data access, and equipment donations. Responsible AI expectations include bias assessments, privacy-by-design requirements, algorithmic transparency documentation, and continuous monitoring of societal impact.

Capabilities for equitable access and researcher enablement

NAIRR aims to democratise AI capabilities by providing tiered compute allocations—from exploratory workloads on shared CPU/GPU clusters to reserved time on exascale DOE systems—and by offering credits for commercial cloud platforms via agreements with providers like Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, and AWS. The NAIRR Datasets pillar will curate high-quality, diverse data sets with metadata standards, provenance tracking, and usage licenses that support reproducible research. NAIRR Education will deliver onboarding tutorials, responsible AI curricula, mentorship networks, and community office hours to support researchers at minority-serving institutions, community colleges, and emerging research universities. Federated identity services, secure data enclaves, and audit logging will facilitate compliance with export controls, sensitive data restrictions, and ethical review boards.

Implementation guidance for universities and labs

Research administrators should inventory existing compute and data resources that could integrate with NAIRR pilots, documenting security certifications, access policies, and capacity. Establish data governance committees to evaluate contributions to NAIRR Datasets, addressing consent, de-identification, and intellectual property rights. Align institutional review board (IRB) procedures with the report’s responsible AI guardrails, including mechanisms to evaluate downstream harms and algorithmic fairness. Develop grant strategies that reference NAIRR alignment—NSF, DOE, and NIH solicitations are expected to prioritise proposals that leverage NAIRR infrastructure for reproducibility and broad participation. Invest in workforce development by training research facilitators and campus cyberinfrastructure leads on NAIRR authentication, resource scheduling, and usage reporting.

Industry and civic partnership opportunities

Technology companies can contribute compute credits, specialised hardware (e.g., accelerators), labelled datasets, or model repositories under data-sharing agreements that specify privacy and security obligations. Civic organisations and SLTT governments can co-create NAIRR Testbeds addressing public-interest use cases such as climate resilience, public health analytics, and transportation optimisation. Nonprofits focused on digital equity can collaborate on outreach programmes to ensure underrepresented communities benefit from NAIRR training modules. Industry partners must commit to transparency regarding data provenance, algorithmic risk, and export controls, aligning contributions with the report’s partnership principles.

Responsible governance and compliance controls

Institutions engaging with NAIRR should establish responsible AI policies that encompass user vetting, acceptable use, safety incident escalation, and data minimisation. Implement privacy engineering techniques—such as differential privacy, federated learning, and secure enclaves—to protect sensitive datasets. Maintain audit trails for compute allocations, dataset downloads, and experiment logs to support oversight and FOIA requests. Coordinate with export control offices to enforce restrictions on dual-use technologies and ensure compliance with International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Embed Title VI and accessibility reviews into onboarding workflows to confirm equitable service delivery.

Measurement, accountability, and impact evaluation

The task force recommends tracking metrics such as number of active users, geographic distribution, proportion of participants from historically underrepresented institutions, compute hours consumed, dataset utilisation, and research outputs (publications, patents, open-source releases). Additional KPIs should assess responsible AI outcomes: bias mitigation effectiveness, incident reports, privacy breaches, and compliance audit findings. Annual reports to Congress should summarise progress against diversity targets, budget execution, and partnerships. Independent program evaluations at the end of Phases 2 and 4 will determine whether NAIRR meets goals for accessibility, innovation, and national competitiveness, informing funding reauthorisations.

External policy linkages and future outlook

NAIRR intersects with broader U.S. initiatives, including the CHIPS and Science Act, the National AI Research and Development Strategic Plan, and the White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights. Policymakers must coordinate to harmonise privacy safeguards, cybersecurity standards (e.g., NIST SP 800-53 and AI RMF), and procurement pathways. Stakeholders should monitor Congressional appropriations, NSF pilot solicitations, and potential legislation establishing NAIRR as a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC). Early pilot outcomes will shape decisions on permanent governance structures, international collaboration, and expansion to K–12 or workforce retraining programmes.

Sources

Zeph Tech partners with research institutions to align grant strategies, responsible AI controls, and infrastructure roadmaps with the NAIRR vision.

Timeline plotting source publication cadence sized by credibility.
4 publication timestamps supporting this briefing. Source data (JSON)
Horizontal bar chart of credibility scores per cited source.
Credibility scores for every source cited in this briefing. Source data (JSON)

Continue in the AI pillar

Return to the hub for curated research and deep-dive guides.

Visit pillar hub

Latest guides

  • National AI Research Resource
  • AI infrastructure
  • US research policy
  • Responsible AI
Back to curated briefings